Wednesday, July 13, 2005

Style

The Harry Potter books are really easy to read. I can read them quickly. I don't need time to get used to the style, except when I first come back to them after reading something else--in that situation, I have to adjust my thinking down so that I'm not offended by the simplicity of the prose. Once I've done that, though, I can just fly right through, and pick up where I've left off with no problems.

They're children's books, so this should not be all that striking. I just wanted to mention that this is quite a contrast to the Thomas Covenant books, which I have to kind of crawl into before I can read at a good clip. The Covenant books aren't as bad as the Aubrey-Maturin books, either. There are whole levels of complexity out there.

One thing I did notice myself doing as I read the Potter books this time was mental revision. Whenever I came across a section that I felt could have been done better, I'd write it over in my head. Mind you, the only reason this happened is that it is much easier to spot errors in simple prose. I can skim along pleasantly and edit on the fly without breaking up my flow.

Mostly my "edits" involved punctuation usage, though there were several sentences I would have removed entirely (they took away from the effect of preceding sentences by overexplaining the situation), and there were a few actual grammatical errors. Yes, I did notice the ellipses...but they didn't bother me as much this time. Maybe I had decided to not let them affect my enjoyment, or maybe I had built them up in my head so much that when I actually came across them, they didn't seem as bad. Either way, I'm glad.

My euphoria at finishing the books is slowly fading. I don't have anything to fill the place Harry Potter is leaving in me--I don't feel like jumping back into Covenant, because that would be too much of a contrast--so I hope I don't go nuts before Saturday.

2 comments:

Heather Meadows said...

I used to listen to audiobooks when I worked at GRW. Stereo compilation is one of the neatest jobs there is, but it's also one of the most boring. You sit there at an analog or digital plotter staring at 3D photographs (one image per eye), and you trace all the details off the photos for a map. Really cool science behind it, but after the novelty wears off you're just doing data entry...

I was one of the fastest and most accurate workers. They wanted me to quit school and work for them full time. I turned that down, though, and after I wrecked my car at the end of 1999 and didn't have a car payment to worry about anymore, I quit.

Since that job, I haven't listened to any audiobooks...I don't suppose I have anything against them, though.

I understand what you mean about the first Harry Potter being completely visceral, while the others started to add intellectual elements. My experience, of course, was different--to me, the successive books were just as visceral, only now I had more to occupy other parts of my brain. I loved it. The emotional aspects became more complex as well. The characters were growing up.

As for your pseudonym, whatever floats your boat ;> I gave up the idea of anonymity on the Internet a long time ago. I have this thing about honesty, as I've mentioned before. I find it much easier to just tell the truth and be myself than to spin webs of deception. I find keeping secrets, in general, tiring and pointless. My favorite parts of books seem to be when secrets are revealed at last :> Also, with no secrets for anyone to find out, there's nothing anyone can later use against me. It's all right here for the world to see. Old news.

Heather Meadows said...

Sorry, my bad :> I hadn't thought about what the purpose of a pseudonym would be beyond anonymity. But I guess you're basically choosing your "Internet nick" at last...