Wednesday, March 23, 2005

Terri Schiavo

Here's the latest article on the Terri Shiavo story. For my biographers, who may not be aware (and for those of you in the present day who have been living under a rock), here's an explanation from the New York Times:

State courts accepted Mr. Schiavo's testimony that his wife told him several times she would not want life-prolonging measures. She suffered extensive brain damage after her heart stopped one night in 1990 due to an undiagnosed potassium deficiency. Mr. Schiavo originally sought help for his wife, but after eight years he asked a state judge for permission to remove her feeding tube and let her die. Her parents believe she is responsive and can improve with more therapy.
The Yahoo article was a lot longer when I read it a few minutes ago, but somehow between now and then the meat has all disappeared. Somewhere in there, it said that Governor Jeb Bush had a doctor from the Mayo Clinic who "believed" that Mrs. Schiavo "might" be in a limited consciousness state, instead of fully being a mental vegetable. Then there's this bit of information from ABC News:

Michael, now 41, lives with Jodi Centonze, a 40-year-old resident of the Clearwater, Fla., area. According to reports, she occasionally accompanies Michael when he visits Terri.

Michael and Centonze have two children together, a fact that the Schindlers have cited as proof of Michael's lack of devotion to his wife, a charge that Michael angrily denies.

When asked on CNN's "Larry King Live" why he doesn't simply divorce his wife, Michael said, "This is Terri's wish, this is Terri's choice. And I'm going to follow that wish if it's the last thing I can do for Terri."
I believe what we are seeing here is the inability of Terri Schiavo's parents to deal with the fact that their daughter is lost to them. They believe that as long as she can blink and move, as long as they can keep her breathing, that she is with them. And they read into her movements, claiming that she is responsive even when doctors (every one of them except this Mayo Clinic guy, and it's unclear whether or not he's even personally seen her) state that there is nothing that can be done, that she is a permanent vegetable.

Meanwhile, we have the man she married...a man who knows his wife is lost, and simply wants to put her body at rest along with her soul. I don't think it's surprising that he has found someone else to love him. Men may be strong, but they are also weak. They have a primal need to be taken care of and nurtured. Michael Schiavo couldn't take on this fight for the wishes of his wife without support.

I read an argument recently that Terri Schiavo's condition is a test from God that she should not run from, that she should remain alive for the sake of her parents. I believe this is false. First, it is not her decision anymore. She is incapable of making the decision. She is a vegetable. Her husband states that she made her decision already, and he has told us what that decision was. We can't claim now that she has the right or ability to change her mind. Second, her parents are not benefiting in any way from Terri Schiavo's survival. They are stuck in the past, trapped by their denial, unable to move on with their lives. Rather than heed their daughter's wishes, they've chosen to selfishly keep her body alive, to demean the man she loved and married, to cause our government to exert an unprecedented (and disturbing) amount of influence in the private lives of its citizens. All because they consider their own needs and desires first. They want their daughter alive because they can't stand the idea that she's dead. Nothing else seems to matter to them.

Sean and I both agree that this poor woman should be allowed to die. If either of us were in the same position, we would choose the same thing. Since we're not sure what kind of reaction our parents would have, we've decided that the best thing to do is to write living wills, so this kind of fiasco won't mark the ends of our lives, too.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

The take you have on Schiavo's husband's other woman and kids is an interesting argument that a polygamist could take and run with. Which is not necessarily to say it's wrong. However, one does wonder if he could just return his wife to the care of her parents (and I will always say that parents have their kid's best interests at heart, more than anyone else could, with rare exception), and wash his hands of it in a different way than taking someone's life on his head.
Furthermore, we don't know really what awaits us when we die, since we haven't experienced death, or what we would be thinking or feeling if we become a vegetable. What I find interesting is that many people who are retarded in some way or other exhibit more joy and peace than people with extraordinary gifts of intellect who do nothing but grouse around all day. Life changing events can change our perspective 360 degrees, make us into completely different people in more ways than one. Most parents can not turn their backs on their kids and say, "let's decide to close this book of her life." I cannot comprehend that being called selfish, and especially more selfish than a husband who's moved on and is enjoying his life more than her devoted parents ever will. Yes, men are weak, and it is forgivable. But how come we can tolerate that, and not the weakness of parents in their singleminded (and thus loftier) love toward their children?
Starving someone to death is starving someone to death, a fact that remains so regardless of examination of the quality of life of the victim. Why don't we affirm the right to die of children starving in poor nations? Heck, things might shape up a little for them, but by and large, their whole entire lives will be spent on the edge of death and destitution. Why send them money and food? Let's just finish their suffering now!

Not to be too aggressive about it; I guess I have strong feelings.

Anonymous said...

And, let's not forget that even vegetables, at least the human varieties, have souls.

Heather Meadows said...

If Michael Schiavo was being selfish and just wanted to write his wife off, he would have divorced her already. The paltry money he won in that one court case probably wouldn't even cover his lawyer fees now, so I can't see that he would stay in this thing solely so he could protect that money. I believe he is sticking with it because Terri told him what she wanted (obviously before this happened), and he is trying to see to her wishes. He's not deciding for her. That's what her parents are doing.

If she had written down her feelings, this wouldn't even be an issue.

Heather Meadows said...

Michael's opinion is pretty interesting. He doesn't give anybody any slack.

(And yay, he has RSS now!)

Anonymous said...

Well, that "paltry" 1.5 million dollars he won in a medical malpractice suit probably covered a bit of his legal fees.

What a lot of people vying for her life find odd is that during those hearings, he swore that he would do anything for his wife to keep her alive and safe. Then he got the settlement.

And then? Then he used a portion of that money to stick her into a home, and threw the rest towards lawyer fees to try and get the tube pulled from her.

One point five million dollars that were meant to help Terri in any way possible. He sticks her in a home, where young kids stick their old parents to die.

Then let's consider some other aspects. Nurses that worked there making the case that on more than one occasion Michael would show up to ask, "Is that bitch dead yet?" or "When is that bitch going to die?"

That doesn't sound like the caring husband to me.

And finally, how about the nurse that swears that Michael was alone with Terri for twenty minutes with the door shut, following which she entered the room and found the following:

Terri shaking uncontrolably.

An empty applicator of insulin in the garbage.

Injection marks under Terri's breasts, and in her crotch.

If you believe Michael's word about Terri's wishes, then at least give a chance of the word of a nurse who was then fired by her employers because she had the gaul to report that incident to the police before she did her superiors.

There's another thing too. Michael found a nurse feeding Terri (a while back) with a baby bottle. Apparently, she can eat puddings, apple sauce, drink water, what have you. Without a feeding tube. But if Michael had let that go on, then pulling the feeding tube would be moot, right? So he had that stopped immediately.

Finally, she is NOT in a vegetative state. To quote some other blogger out there (because I'm too lazy to write it myself):

"The term Vegetative State, has come to be applied to people who actually do show some signs of awareness (Terri Schivao). PVS often is confused with "brain death," although the two are not the same. (Brain death is defined as the irreversible loss of all functions of the brain.) Appallingly, "right to die" advocates and Terri’s husband Michael- have used the PVS to unite people to their rationale. It has even tainted the positions in some states laws altering them to classify the basics of life (food and water) as medical treatment!

"Imagine a cup of chocolate malted flavored protein drink?¢??¬??it has now become classified as medical treatment. I didn’t know feeding someone sustenance or giving him or her a cup of cold water was considered medical treatment. I thought it was just caring for those who can’t care for themselves due to their physical challenges or financial inabilities. I guess all the quadriplegics had better be watching out and so should third world nations. Human rights organizations may see you eating and drinking H2O and decide no, you’ve no right to medical treatment- give me that bowl of rice, NOW!

"Persistent Vegetative State is not easily diagnosed. Although accepted signs of PVS include the absence of awareness of oneself or one's environment, we cannot measure thought or awareness -- only behavior and movement. Today's medical tests are not specific enough to make a certain diagnosis of PVS. As a result, the rate of misdiagnosis is high, approximately 40 percent in some studies. Physical disabilities experienced by many of these patients, such as blindness and paralysis, can stop them from exhibiting behaviors that could make their awareness known. Recent video footage shot of Terri Schiavo shows her smiling and responding to her surroundings, leading many to question whether she is actually in the state of PVS. If you really want to know the answer to this, ask her parents and friends."

Taken from:
http://journals.aol.com/justice1949/JUSTICEFORTERRISCHIAVO/entries/504


Now, you may see the shit I just posted and wonder if I'm making it all up. Or maybe the general American public is just not kept informed enough. How come I know this and you don't? That could be why there is such a pulling for her to be "allowed" to die by a guy that seems more interested in her life insurance than her life.

They are arresting children for trying to take her a glass of water. They have a POLICEMAN in the ROOM with her to make sure her parents don't WET HER LIPS WITH A Q-TIP.

If she dies as a result of this mess, I will never accept it as just. I will never accept it as right.

And while Michael Schavio announces to his girlfriend and two kids: "That bitch is finally dead," I'll just simply be waiting for the real truth to come out where everyone can see it. After it's too late. After she's already gone.

Heather Meadows said...

That stuff is really scary, if it's true. If it's true, I take back everything, and say that her husband needs to get the hell away from her, and that she needs to be allowed to eat and drink again.

If it's true, why isn't it in the news articles I've been reading?

Anonymous said...

I must admit these takes on the Terri Schiavo case are interesting. I fully believe that if her husband did not care about her, he would have gotten rid of this 'burden' long ago. Yet, in truth I feel he knows what his wife would have wanted. No one in Terri's situation would want to live like she is living now. I would rather starve to death for a few weeks, than live until I am 80 as a vegetable.